NCAA Men's Goalkeeper Rankings (Preseason Fall 2025)

Seniors

1. Nigel Van Haveren (FIU, Netherlands)
2. Freddie Lapworth (Bucknell, England)
3. Logan Erb (NC State)
4. Alec McLachlan (St. John's, England)
5. Devin Armstrong (NJIT)
6. Andrew Cordes (North Carolina)
7. Holden Brown (Indiana)
8. Owen Cornell (UIC)
9. Tenzing Manske (Georgetown)
10. James Lowell (Marist)

One to Watch: Nigel Van Haveren. Van Haveren is easily one of the most explosive goalkeepers in the college game. For a level of competition that is so heavily focused on goalkeepers simply not making errors, Van Haveren has come out of the woodwork to show that goalkeepers can be more exciting than a tall, lumbering figure in net. Hailing from Vitesse Arnhem’s academy system, Van Haveren may be one of the rare international goalkeepers that MLS teams could look to bring in. American (and English, by proxy) will be annoyed at his complete disregard for sound mechanics but his ability to keep his team in a close game with a game-changing save is rare to find in college these days.

Juniors

1. Wyatt Nelson (UCLA)
2. Aidan Crawford (Loyola-Chicago)
3. Jonathan Munteanu (Dayton)
4. Rowan Schnebly (Stanford)
5. Ky Mani Dade (Loyola Marymount)
6. Thomas MacAuley (George Washington, England)
7. Soren Russell (SMU)
8. Zack Andoh (California)
9. Franco Barba (Eastern Illinois)
10. Isaiah Goldson (Michigan)

One to Watch: Wyatt Nelson. For a goalkeeper that probably should have left college by now, there doesn’t seem to be much slowing down Nelson’s trajectory. The 6’3” Seattle Sounders product has one of the more impressive resumes heading into college and he’s primed to take over the coveted starting spot for UCLA, marking him yet another USYNT goalkeeper for the Bruins. Although Nelson fulfills the safety blanket feeling most head coaches are desperately looking for, the college game inherently gets sloppier as the season rolls on and that’s not necessarily Nelson’s forte. If Nelson can find success when the play breaks down, his stock will only continue to skyrocket.

Sophomores

1. Blake Kelly (Notre Dame)
2. Leo Ledin (Virginia Tech, Sweden)
3. Pepe Hinterschuster (Wofford, Germany)
4. Marten Brink (Marquette, Germany)
5. Filip Versterre (South Carolina, Denmark)
6. Declan Finnegan (IUPUI)
7. Jonah Mednard (Wake Forest)
8. Matisse Hebert (Wisconsin, Canada)
9. Spencer Sanderson (Virginia)
10. Carlito Saylon (Tulsa)

One to Watch: Blake Kelly. RSL is known for producing a steady stream of, at the very least, college-ready goalkeepers and Kelly is the latest example. Kelly notched 12 starts for the Fighting Irish last fall before graduate student Collin Travasos finished the season, leaving a “what if” cloud hanging over the season. Moving forward, Kelly won’t have many opportunities to find a rhythm in the game, as Notre Dame’s defense historically does a decent job of negating shots. Now entering his sophomore year, most of Kelly’s defensive actions will likely lean a little more difficult than easy. If Kelly can embrace the sit-for-89-minutes-and-make-one-save mentality, look for Kelly to help bolster Notre Dame’s final four aspirations.

Freshmen

1. Joshua Grant (South Florida)
2. Patrick Los (Michigan)
3. Nick Bishop (Pittsburgh)
4. Alan Rutkowski (North Carolina)
5. Patryk Stechnij (Wisconsin)
6. Dylan Auffret (Penn)
7. Gavin Atkinson (Grand Canyon)
8. Owen Beninga (UC Santa Barbara)
9. Cole Kowalski (Notre Dame)
10. Dmytro Torubara (Georgetown)

One to Watch: Patrick Los. It’s been a while since we’ve had a 5’11” goalkeeper kick the door down in college but Los has as good a chance as anyone else that’s come before him. The Chicago Fire product was once touted as the next big thing when Slonina and Brady were garnering hype but the USYNT fanbase has largely cooled on him, despite his 37 professional appearances with Chicago Fire 2. Whether it was the lack of height or something else, Los has some doubters to prove wrong as he heads north. Keep an eye on the USYNT goalkeeper to see if he can unseat returning starter Isaiah Goldson or if he’ll have to play the waiting game like almost every other freshman.

Past Collegiate Goalkeeper Rankings

2024: Preseason
2023: Preseason and Final
2022: Preseason and Final
2021: Preseason and Final
2020: Preseason and Final
2019: Preseason and Final
2018: Preseason and Final
2017: Preseason and Final
2016: Preseason and Final
2015: Preseason and Final
2014: Preseason and Final

NCAA Women's Goalkeeper Rankings (Preseason Fall 2025)

Seniors

1. Teagan Wy (California)
2. Pauline Nelles (Arizona State, Germany)
3. Olivia Pratapas (NC State)
4. Keara Fitzgerald (Washington State)
5. Jordan Brown (Georgia)
6. Ally Lynch (Purdue)
7. Addy Holgorsen (Clemson)
8. Camryn Miller (Cincinnati)
9. Bella Hollenbach (Milwaukee)
10. Kamryn Willoughby (Eastern Washington)

11. Shea Vanderbosch (Syracuse)
12. Caroline Duffy (Oklahoma)
13. Ally Zazzara (Tennessee)
14. JLo Varada (Campbell, Puerto Rico)
15. Jordan Nytes (Colorado)
16. Cara Martin (Georgetown)
17. Sally Rainey (Indiana)
18. Cassie Coster (Monmouth)
19. Blythe Braun (Syracuse)
20. Belle Okoroafo (Michigan State)

One to Watch: Keara Fitzgerald. Fitzgerald enters the 2025 season with hopes of finishing her long and winding road on a positive note, while Washington State looks to recapture some of the magic in their 2019 Final Four run. State’s middling past few years paired with Fitzgerald returning from ACL surgery raise some questions on what to ultimately expect to see, as it’s a situation that can easily go sour if one or two things turn the wrong way. However, if Fitzgerald can stay healthy and return to form, she might not only be able to get State to regain their postseason magic, but she might also give herself a chance at playing at the next level.

Juniors

1. Victoria Safradin (Virginia)
2. Olivia Bodmer (Rutgers)
3. Kate Phillips (Missouri)
4. Maddie Buckley (UC Santa Barbara)
5. Izzy Lee (Illinois)
6. Leah Parsons (UAB, Canada)
7. Abby Gundry (North Carolina)
8. Kyla Holmes (Yale)
9. Morgan Hobbs (UNC Wilmington)
10. Allison Deardorff (Loyola-Chicago)

One to Watch: Olivia Bodmer. Of Rutgers’ 21 games last season, 15 were decided by a goal or less, highlighting the importance of Bodmer’s play. There were certainly some low points in the season, notably Bodmer’s failed clearance against Maryland or the unfortunate deflection off the post against UConn, but the Jersey-native wasn’t afraid to put her body on the line to keep her side in the fight, as she did countless times last fall. Bodmer teeters on the cusp of good or great, depending on how much nuance Bodmer can instill in her game moving forward. Look to see how the upperclassman has added detail in her game as Rutgers will surely lean heavily on their goalkeeper this fall.

Sophomores

1. Liv Geller (TCU)
2. Hannah Johann (North Carolina, Germany)
3. Sonoma Kasica (Notre Dame)
4. Sydney Fuller (Texas A&M)
5. Jamie Campbell (Colorado)
6. Addie Todd (Florida State)
7. Sarah Wommack (Mississippi State)
8. Genesis Perez Watson (UCF, Costa Rica)
9. Jillian Medvecky (Pepperdine)
10. Nona Reason (Clemson)
11. Mariangela Medina (UCLA, Mexico)
12. Kennadie Marchand (Vanderbilt)

One to Watch: Sarah Wommack. Wommack looks to pioneer the Appalachian State-to-Mississippi State transfer pipeline as the freshman shocked opposing coaches with her continual rebuffing of opposing offenses. Now in the SEC, Wommack will have to take on even more responsibility as State’s expectations are at an all-time high, coming off one of its best seasons ever. Wommack has been granted the number one jersey for a reason but for a program that’s looking to move beyond a Sweet Sixteen appearance, Wommack will need more than athleticism to bolster the Bulldogs’ chances in November. If Wommack can continue to extend her skill set beyond shot-stopping, look for the rocket on Wommack’s back to grow even larger.

Freshmen

1. Lexi Baldwin (Mississippi)
2. Evan O'Steen (Florida State)
3. Molly Vapensky (Duke)
4. Caroline Birkel (Stanford)
5. Zoe Anderson (UNC Wilmington)
6. Nyamma Nelson (Northwestern)
7. Jacqueline Gabbert (Minnesota)
8. Kennedy Zorn (Michigan State)
9. Wicki Dunlap (Virginia)
10. Kaele Smith (NJIT)

One to Watch: Evan O'Steen. Although TST headlines were rightfully filled with Hope Solo and Lindsey Harris, the young Florida State commit had an impressive showing in the summer tournament at just 17 years old. O’Steen was active in organizing the defense, cutting off slotted balls into the 18, and playing well off her line in order to help maintain possession for her team. The confident keeper did well in most areas of the field but close range situations saw her caught between two minds too often. Assuming the YNT goalkeeper will get a chance on the field this fall, look to see how O’Steen does on a larger stage and in a larger goal with one of the top schools in the nation this fall.

Past Collegiate Goalkeeper Rankings

2024: Preseason and Final
2023: Preseason and Final
2022: Preseason and Final
2021: Preseason and Final
2020: Preseason and Final
2019: Preseason and Final
2018: Preseason and Final
2017: Preseason and Final
2016: Preseason and Final
2015: Preseason and Final

Why Some Online Slots Get Banned in Certain Countries

Online slots travel the internet border-free, yet many never make it past the digital frontiers of some nations. From strict local laws to cultural expectations, multiple forces can push a seemingly innocent game into the “prohibited” pile.

Understanding the Regulatory Frameworks

Every jurisdiction approaches gambling through its own legal prism. In the EU, for example, member states share overarching consumer-protection directives but still draft individual gambling acts; meanwhile, the U.S. delegates online-gaming approval to each state, and many Asian countries outlaw it altogether.For those interested in exploring different options, you can check out this https://casinosanalyzer.ca/casino-bonuses/ragingbullcasino.com and the bonuses it has to offer.

Regulators typically focus on three core goals:

●      Protecting vulnerable players (under-age users, compulsive gamblers).

●      Safeguarding financial integrity (AML/KYC, tax compliance).

●      Preserving cultural or religious values.

A slot that undermines any one of those goals — even unintentionally — risks removal or an outright ban.

Key Factors That Lead to Slot Bans

Before listing the main “triggers”, know that authorities use many factors to evaluate titles. With that perspective, let’s examine the most prevalent red flags.

The major reasons regulators strike a slot from the authorized catalogue are listed below:

1. Extreme volatility: Ultra-high variance games may exceed “player harm” standards for loss per minute.

2. Bonus Buy and Ante Bet in-game: These mechanisms allow players to avoid RTP cycles and seek huge winnings quicker, hence the UK bans them.

3. Improper cultural imagery: Local decency rules sometimes prohibit depictions of sensitive religious symbols, drug usage, or politics.

4. Lack of certified RNG or transparent RTP: Licensees deny distribution if a developer doesn’t provide lab-tested randomness reports.

5. Misleading marketing hooks: Game ads featuring “risk-free,” “guaranteed win,” or similar promises are frequently banned under truth-in-advertising rules.

6. Unauthorized IP themes: Slots that imitate big movies, sports teams, or celebrities are quickly removed.

A ban is more likely when multiple of these indicators coincide, such as a volatile slot with unauthorized pop-culture figures.

Case Studies: Famous Banned Slots Around the World

“Book of Ra Deluxe” in Italy (2019)

Despite its massive popularity, Novomatic’s Egyptian classic disappeared from the Italian.it domain for three months after the regulator questioned its higher-than-normal volatility. A revised version with toned-down variance re-entered the market in early 2020.

“El Dorado Infinity Reels” in the UK (2022)

Britain’s strict stance on Bonus Buy features forced ReelPlay to withdraw the game. The studio later released a UK-compliant edition that removed the paid free-spin shortcut but retained the core Infinity Reels mechanic.

“Grand Theft Auto Slot” Clone in Australia (2023)

An unauthorized imitation of Rockstar’s IP hit grey-market sites and quickly drew the attention of Australia’s ACMA. The watchdog ordered all local ISPs to block access, citing both copyright infringement and incentivized violence.

These case studies highlight how diverse the triggers can be: excessive risk, extra-cost mechanics, or simple IP theft.

Who Feels the Impact When a Slot Disappears?

The sudden loss of a hit game echoes across the entire value chain. Players are the most visible victims, especially if they were mid-way through a bonus round or had collected loyalty points tied to that title. For them, the ban raises immediate concerns about the fate of unfinished progress and pending jackpot contributions.

Operators face a different headache: depressed revenues coupled with emergency compliance checks. Because popular slots often account for a significant slice of turnover, their removal forces casinos to redesign lobbies, draft customer-service explanations, and hunt for replacement games that will satisfy the same demographic.

Developers must pivot quickly. Recording a game to satisfy new regional requirements may cost tens of thousands of dollars, and the studio may have to pay additional certification costs if it changes the math model or audiovisual assets. Brand reputation suffers in such circumstances, particularly when the media portrays the ban as irresponsible.

Because removed games lower click-through rates and destroy advertising links, affiliates have issues. Every hour of downtime spent updating reviews, banners, and SEO efforts reduces commissions. After banning something, regulators must explain it to industry stakeholders and may face paternalism allegations.

How Developers Future-Proof Their Releases

Forward-thinking studios now treat regulatory compliance as a core design pillar rather than an after-thought. One widely adopted tactic is feature toggling. By building optional modules — such as Bonus Buy buttons — into separate code blocks, teams can deactivate those elements in sensitive territories without altering the underlying random-number generator or pay-table logic.

Variable RTP profiles offer another layer of flexibility. A studio may ship the same slot with 86 percent, 94 percent, and 96 percent returns. Operators then select the version that satisfies the minimum payout rate imposed by local law. Meanwhile, cultural reskinning tools enable artists to replace potentially offensive symbols, backdrops, or storylines with neutral imagery.

It is now common for early partners to work with approved test labs like eCOGRA or iTech Labs. Developers make sure that mathematical models, security measures, and responsible-gaming layers meet international standards a long time before the game goes live to the public by having inspectors in the test phase. These steps not only speed up the process of getting a license, but they also lower the chance of shock bans after the movie comes out.

Will bans get stricter or less strict?

The world is talking more and more about how to gamble responsibly. Europe’s forthcoming EU Digital Services Act may tighten user data laws. AI-powered compliance technologies allow regulators to observe events in real time, making it simpler to discover rule-breaking games.

However, blockchain audits and provably fair algorithms may convince governments that explicit code is preferable than punitive restrictions. As a result, there will likely be more detailed monitoring. Instead of broad beans, you can expect specific feature locks and required risk statements.

Conclusion

Slots are rarely banned because of a single “bad” feature. Instead, they show up where the law, society, and player safety all meet. It’s possible for high variation, controversial themes, bonus-buy features, or IP problems to tip the scales. But so can changes in public opinion or government goals.

The best defense for players is to know what the rules are for each game, choose approved sites, and read the local laws. Operators should use dynamic content filters, and writers should make compliance a part of their design processes from the start.

In the end, regulations are getting stricter, but that doesn’t mean clever slot design is doomed. Teams that come up with new ideas in a smart way will continue to entertain people around the world — without crossing the unseen lines that lead to a sudden ban.

Betting in the shadows of the future: 1win, privacy, and the rise of digital safe havens

In an era marked by surveillance capitalism, financial overreach, and increasing demands for user data, the digital frontier is undergoing a quiet revolution. At the center of this shift is a new class of platforms that are not only decentralized but resistant to the traditional norms of identity verification and state oversight. Among them, 1win emerges as more than just a crypto-powered gaming space — it stands as a potential model for the next generation of digital sovereignty.

As global scrutiny on personal data intensifies, users are beginning to seek online environments that offer more than just functionality — they crave autonomy, discretion, and control over their digital identities. Platforms like 1win, built on the ethos of Web3, are carving out zones of permissionless participation, where privacy isn’t a luxury — it’s a feature baked into the experience.

Simultaneously, the concept of the “offshore” is being redefined. No longer limited to distant islands and corporate shells, the new offshore exists in digital form — operating across borders, immune to localized control, and fueled by cryptocurrency. 1win is tapping into this evolution, offering users not only entertainment but refuge from increasingly invasive regulatory regimes.

This isn’t just about betting anymore — it’s about the right to engage freely, without handing over personal information or relying on traditional financial systems. As the lines between finance, identity, and geography dissolve, platforms like 1win are leading the way into a world where anonymity and access can finally coexist.

New havens, new rules: how 1win and crypto platforms are replacing traditional offshores

For decades, the term “offshore” evoked images of secluded islands, opaque bank accounts, and legal loopholes exploited by corporations and the ultra-wealthy. But in the digital age, that model is being reengineered. Today’s offshore is not a tropical jurisdiction — it’s a decentralized protocol. And platforms like 1win are helping pioneer this shift, acting as digital safe havens for individuals seeking freedom from surveillance-heavy systems and restrictive financial controls.

The rise of blockchain technology has fundamentally changed how value moves, how identities are managed, and how privacy is protected. Instead of relying on outdated legal shelters, users now look to crypto-powered platforms that offer the same benefits — security, discretion, and global access — but in a completely virtual, code-based environment.

Here’s how the old offshore model compares to the emerging framework 1win represents in the age of Web3:

As governments tighten regulations on offshore finance and surveillance practices become more aggressive, digital platforms like 1win offer an alternative vision. One where freedom doesn’t depend on where you are or who you know — but simply on whether you hold the keys to your own wallet.

This emerging reality reframes what it means to seek financial refuge. The new safe haven is trustless, transparent in code, and globally available. Platforms like 1win aren’t hiding in legal loopholes — they’re building a parallel system that operates independently of traditional power structures.

In this context, 1win is more than a gaming portal. It’s a gateway into a post-jurisdictional world, where users reclaim agency over their identity, their data, and their capital — not through secrecy, but through sovereignty.

Betting on privacy: why 1win users are choosing Web3 anonymity over traditional KYC

In the digital era, where every transaction and login leaves a trail, users are beginning to rethink the cost of convenience. For many, especially those entering the crypto space, privacy is no longer a preference — it’s a priority. As regulatory frameworks tighten their grip with mandatory KYC (Know Your Customer) protocols, an increasing number of users are migrating toward platforms that offer something different. 1win, with its Web3-first approach, is one of those platforms drawing privacy-conscious individuals looking to reclaim their digital autonomy.

Here’s why more users are rejecting traditional KYC requirements and embracing the anonymity built into the Web3 structure of platforms like 1win:

●      Protection from data leaks: centralized platforms store massive amounts of personal data, which can be compromised in hacks or sold to third parties. 1win offers a minimal-data experience where users retain control over what they share — often, nothing at all.

●      No identity, no discrimination: KYC frameworks often create unintentional barriers based on geography, age, income, or nationality. With Web3-based access, 1win ensures equal entry — no profiling, no gatekeeping.

●      Bypassing bureaucracy: traditional platforms require long verification processes with ID uploads and approval delays. On 1win, users can start playing instantly, needing only a crypto wallet — cutting red tape and saving time.

●      Freedom from financial surveillance: transactions tied to verified banking details are easily monitored by governments and institutions. Crypto-enabled platforms like 1win allow for peer-to-peer financial activity that avoids oversight and censorship.

●      Global inclusion without borders: in countries where gambling or access to online platforms is restricted, KYC blocks participation. 1win’s Web3 anonymity allows players to engage freely, regardless of local limitations.

●      Self-custody as a value: Web3 empowers users to manage their own funds without custodians. 1win supports this philosophy, enabling full control without requiring trust in external institutions or payment processors.

●      Ideological alignment with decentralization: many crypto-native users value decentralization not just as technology, but as a principle. 1win reflects that ideology by removing central control over identity and access.

●      Mitigating reputational risks: some users wish to separate their online activities from their public or professional lives. By avoiding KYC, 1win respects the right to compartmentalize identity in a digital age.

As KYC becomes the global norm across traditional finance and gaming platforms, Web3 alternatives like 1win stand out by offering a more respectful and autonomous user experience. The future of privacy in online entertainment may not lie in compliance checklists, but in zero-knowledge architecture, wallet-based access, and a culture of consent rather than coercion.

For 1win users, the message is clear: you don’t have to trade your identity for the right to play.

Conclusion: the new age of autonomy — how 1win embodies the shift to private, stateless platforms

As digital spaces grow increasingly complex, users are beginning to question the traditional structures that have long governed access, identity, and financial freedom. The emergence of platforms like 1win signals not just a change in how people play — but in how they live, interact, and protect themselves in a rapidly digitizing world.

No longer satisfied with being over-verified, over-watched, and over-regulated, today’s users are turning toward ecosystems that prioritize anonymity, autonomy, and fairness. 1win, by embracing Web3 principles, becomes more than a casino — it becomes a symbol of resistance against centralized control, and a gateway to self-determined digital existence.

As we’ve explored, crypto platforms are becoming the new digital offshores: borderless, fast-moving, and decentralized. And while governments push harder for KYC and surveillance, users push back with wallets, encryption, and platforms like 1win — where participation doesn’t depend on permission.

Privacy is no longer a fringe concern. It is the foundation for trust in an open web. And as 1win continues to grow within this evolving landscape, it proves one thing above all: the future belongs to platforms that give users not just entertainment, but control, dignity, and freedom by design.